ATTN E360 MEMBERS - THE TRUE MISSION IS *YOU* NOT A FEW DISHONEST LEADERS!
NTM/E360 has a long history of PROTECTing KNOWN predators
AS HIGHLIGHTED ABOVE UNDER "CURRENT DEFINITIONS OF SEXUAL ABUSE" THERE IS THIS... "The involvement of a child in sexual activity by an adult".
THAT WORDING IS CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS.
As you will discover throughout this website, Ethnos360 Executive Leadership does not always follow their own Policy Manual as it is published. From Punishments for Sexual Abuse, to violations of the Non-Retaliation policy, Ethnos Leadership is completely unaccountable to Mission Members and in some instances, Judges and Courts.
NTM/ETHNOS360 CLEARLY DEFINES THE PUNISHMENT Policy FOR SEX ABUSE.
Ethnos, by what criteria were an "affair" with a Teenager by the wife of a Field Chairman and even a case of "incest" which was admitted to and verified by the victim, not found to be Sexual Abuse as the Ethnos Policy Manual defines it?
Survivors view this as being typical Double Standards by Executive Leaders.
We and many observers would also like to know the truth about the obvious pattern of "selective enforcement" of violations of your Child Safety Policy as evidenced by the two cases we will highlight below (and there are many others ETP will cite if it becomes necessar ).
We researchers cannot find any explanation for these contradictory facts except "favoritism and corruption". We completely reject the obviously false Historical Narratives regarding Child Abuse which Ethnos publishes as though they are "Gospel"!
THE ETHNOS "CORPORATE PROPAGANDA MACHINE" KEPT THESE QUIET
Since we know from witnesses and the public document trail that CEO Brown and other of NTM's Leaders were desperate to keep Members from even reading G.R.A.C.E. and certainly not reading any of the 30,411 posts on the Fanda Eagles Survivor Forums, we have published G.R.A.C.E. 2010 in its entirety along with screenshots and facts gleaned from Fanda Eagles and other public forums. There should be no doubt in an honest person's mind that Ethnos Leadership needs to be put under oath and questioned about their individual knowledge and involvement in Cover-ups of Child Abuse and other potential crimes.
Until the "Gatekeepers" at HQ are all removed from power so that deeper examinations of whatever corporate records which are not already "sanitized" by then can be analyzed, it will be impossible to know the full extent of the ungodly actions of NTM/Ethnos360 Mission Leadership.
Despite a few close calls during the Jane Doe Lawsuits from 2011 - 2015 when NTM repeatedly refused to turn over internal documents as ordered by the Courts, Ethnos has never been subjected to “Legal Discovery”.
Based upon what is known, it does not require any imagination to see why Larry Brown will fight tooth and nail to prevent actual accountability from himself or other men who are his Co-conspirators in these Cover-ups..
DONNA BEACH CONTROVERSIES #1 AND #2
NTM COVERED FOR FAYE BUTLER. WHY?
NTM USED DONNA BEACH TO FALSELY SMEAR THE 2010 GRACE REPORT
NTM MASTERFULLY USED MINOR TECHNICALITIES AND DECEPTION TO DISCREDIT THE 2010 GRACE REPORT IN ORDER TO KEEP MISSION MEMBERS FROM LEARNING THE TRUTH.
Below are examples of Double-Standard secrets which were outlined in the 2010 G.R.A.C.E. Report or were readily available on Abuse Survivor Forums but which Ethnos360's Leadership found it necessary to hide from Mission Members and Supporters over the years.
G.R.A.C.E in 2010 is the only independent Child Abuse Investigation NTM ever had conducted.
NTM could not risk losing control of the information flow so they devised an ingenious plan to create "IHART" which was secretly controlled by NTM's Executives from the beginning in 2011!
We have numerous reasons to "suspect" that a forensic exam of the effort to discredit the 2010 G.R.A.C.E. Report would reveal fingerprints belonging to Attorney Theresa Sidebotham and various NTM Executives who try to deny their past relationship with Attorney Sidebotham, even though it is documented.
DONNA BEACH CONTROVERSY PAGE 2
DONNA BEACH CONTROVERSY PAGE 3
DONNA BEACH CONTROVERSY PAGE 4
DONNA BEACH CONTROVERSY P5 WHY WAS DONNA BEACH "PROTECTED"?
...AND THE "NIECE" OF MR "LEAVE THE LID ON THIS" PAUL WYMA
THE STRANGE CASE OF FAYE BUTLER...
THE SCREENSHOT ABOVE IS "ONE" ACCOUNT OF FAYE'S CONFESSION, THERE ARE OTHERS IN MULTIPLE PLACES IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
As further confirmation, the male victim has confirmed that Faye 'did' molest him when he was a child.
So, to recap, the Abuser and the Victim both agree the Sex Abuse occurred, NTM knows it occurred, members of the public know it occurred and yet Mission Leadership pretends that it was a private matter and there were no consequences and apparently not even any safeguards put in place?
WITNESSES CLAIM BRIAN COOMBS PERSONALLY INVESTIGATED THIS!
Mr Coombs... Did you meet with Faye Butler and her sending church pastor in 2013 as is alleged?
If you did investigate, exactly how did you and presumably the Mission Board determine that this particular "Historical Incest" qualified for some kind of "look-away" on the part of the NTM Executive Board which allowed NTM to ignore their own Child Abuse Policies and the confession by Faye as well as the alleged confirmation by the Victim?
Ethnos has such a credibility problem in the real world that this sort of thing really doesn't look very good.
QUESTIONS ABOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS AT ETHNOS ABOUND
Evidence in the public record indicates that Faye Butler and Donna Beach have committed acts prohibited by the Ethnos360 Child Protection Policies, yet they were protected by Ethnos and allowed to remain Members In Good Standing?
Something does not add up here. Members and Abuse Survivors deserve a valid explanation instead of double-speak and 'equivocation' coming from Scandal Spokesman Brian Coombs on behalf of CEO Larry Brown!