ATTN E360 MEMBERS - THE TRUE MISSION IS *YOU* NOT A FEW DISHONEST LEADERS!
ALLEGATIONS OF MALFEASANCE DEFINED AND EXPLAINED
CORPORATE MALFEASANCE
CORPORATE MALFEASANCE
On this website, we are defining Corporate Malfeasance as intentional, unethical and even illegal actions by Executives of Ethnos360 Corporation such as falsifying documents that pertain to the organization, destroying evidence from Child Abuse Cases, or representing that they meet certain published standards required for ECFA Accreditation even when they know they aren't in compliance, but they lie on their website in order to help them maintain greater donor confidence than is justified.
GENERAL MALFEASANCE
CORPORATE MALFEASANCE
Malfeasance is wrongdoing on a scale that indicates it is more serious than mere errors because it is done intentionally for a perceived advantage as compared to what would result if rules, ethical principles or even laws were adhered to. If an Executive Board will not transparently disclose the amounts of money they are expending on lawyers and 12 years of IHART Investigations, it might be because some type of Malfeasance is involved which they cannot afford to disclose to Members and Supporters .
WHAT IS AN AMICUS BRIEF?
When there is a lawsuit filed, it is possible that an "Interested Third Party" that is not involved in the Lawsuit may have information or additional documentation that the Plaintiff, Defense, or the Court may not have been aware existed, but which information is potentially important for the Court to consider in context of the proceeding.
Evidence can be submitted to the Court through the use of an Amicus.
WHAT IS CORPORATE INDEMNITY?
WHAT IS CORPORATE INDEMNITY?
Corporate Indemnity is a benefit that is often sought after there is a lawsuit filed, or a criminal investigation and one or more Executives or Employees of an Organization are 'alleged" by the Plaintiff to have done something that is negligent or even criminally wrong such that they are named in the Civil Lawsuit as a co-defendant of the Corporation. Indemnity means that the Corporation pays for the Personal Defense costs of the Executive or Employee, even if they are alleged to have committed a crime personally.
COLLUSION vs CONSPIRACY
WHAT IS CORPORATE INDEMNITY?
COLLUSION vs CONSPIRACY
Collusion could be a group of Mission Executives who are facing mounting credible claims of Child Abuse at the hands of Mission Members, deciding they need to come up with a plan to avoid Corporate Liability by any means necessary, even if that meant doing shady things that must be kept secret. The initial Collusion to cover up the scale of past Abuse might become a Conspiracy if you act to create a front organization called IHART which you secretly control and then lie about it year after year.
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
WHAT IS CORPORATE INDEMNITY?
COLLUSION vs CONSPIRACY
Fiduciary Obligations that apply to persons serving on a Mission Board, would include the requirement that they are honest in their internal communications to Members. They must verify the details of what the Board is authorizing regarding the day to day operation of the organization. For instance, the Board approval of certain legal, but very unethical tactics by their lawyers during Jane Doe Lawsuits which would be embarrassing if disclosed to Members or Supporters could be a violation of one's duties.
DUE DILIGENCE
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
CORPORATE RETALIATION
Due diligence is a concept that someone asked to serve on an Executive Board, as part of his Fiduciary Obligations of being a Board Member 'should' investigate whether or not the materials being published by the organization are accurate and complete when compared to public information or documents.
We cannot find any evidence that several current and past Ethnos Executives have ever even heard of Due Diligence, let alone practiced it, since year after year they're silent.
CORPORATE RETALIATION
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
CORPORATE RETALIATION
Corporate Retaliation can take many forms. This is the final step that happens when attempts at Corporate Intimidation fail to force Mission Members into remaining silent after they confronted Leadership about their intentional deceit regarding the true nature of IHART and other ethically or morally questionable actions by the Executive Board. Members who are retaliated against are forced to leave the Mission as punishment for demanding Truth. Not all of these will be "Quiet Leavers".
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
Legal Discovery happens when there is a lawsuit filed, and one or more of the parties believe there may be incriminating evidence in the internal records or communications of the opposing party. An 'Order for Discovery' compels the opposing party to turn over all internal documentation related to the case.
Ethnos under the NTM name has a history of refusing court orders to turn over incriminating documentation in past Abuse Cases.
NTM FAMILY or CORPORATION?
NTM FAMILY or CORPORATION?
LEGAL DISCOVERY - IS E360 AFRAID?
This is an important concept. NTMers rightfully think of "The Mission" as one big happy extended family who happen to live all around the world. Members are all "Family". The reality is that "The Mission" is actually a very complex multi-tiered set of "Corporations" which are being run more like "Mission Depot". A small group of "Corporate Executives" have taken advantage of the fact the "Family" trusts them 100% with no questions asked.
An "Infidelity Divorce" is coming.
IS E360 COO Dallon Anderson's AFFIDAVIT 'Fully' ACCURATE?
E360's COO Dallon Anderson is being put in the "ETP Spotlight" right now because it is being alleged that his March 19, 2024 Affidavit in a Tax Lawsuit in Wisconsin 'MAY' have numerous misrepresentations of facts that Dallon "swore to" under oath. If true, that would be very recent evidence of a wider problem of alleged dishonesty within Ethnos360's Executive Leadership.
OBVIOUSLY ETP IS PUTTING THIS BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT HERE FOR A REASON. ETHNOS360 HAS A TRANSPARENCY AND LACK OF TRUTHFULNESS PROBLEM.
ETP WILL BE POSTING MORE DOCUMENTATION AND "RECEIPTS" VERY SOON SO READERS CAN JUDGE FOR THEMSELVES.
Ethnos360 Inc COO Dallon Anderson's Sworn Affidavit is part of a Lawsuit E360's Corporate Affiliate* "Global Assist Campus Inc" filed in March of 2024.
(*) Ethnos360 Inc and Global Assist Inc along with numerous other Corporations are part of a very complex set of separate, but inter-related, Entities which add layers of obscurity to what Ethnos360 does behind the scenes. The2018 filing of "church status" for E360 Inc adds even more difficulty for anyone who is interested in discovering Truth.
CONTRARY TO THEIR CLAIMS, ETHNOS360 IS 'NOT' TRANSPARENT!
"I make this affidavit based upon my personal knowledge and upon books and records of Ethnos360" - Dallon Anderson
Dallon Anderson's Affidavit "Subscribed and sworn to before me" March 19, 2024 - E360 Notary Tim Meisel
Remember the "sworn to before me" part later on.
ETP wonders... what happens if someone questions the "authenticity of the original" document(s) that Dallon claims he has "reviewed and confirmed they are true and accurate copies", but according to whistle-blowers they may not appear to be genuine?
We will post several examples here so you can compare them and decide.
One remedy for drawing attention to an alternate set of facts in a case that the Court may not be aware of, is commonly referred to as an Amicus Brief (aka Friend of The Court).
Amicus Briefs may challenge whether or not a party in litigation has ALLEGEDLY not been truthful in their filings or if they may have submitted documents that 'may not' be authentic..
If the opposing party remains unaware that alternate documentation exists they 'could be' put at a disadvantage, and the truth may be hidden.